Research Primer 2026-05 (Paraphrasing in the Age of AI)

References:

• American Psychological Association. (n.d.-a). Basic principles of citation. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/basic-principles
• American Psychological Association. (n.d.-b). Paraphrases. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/paraphrasing
• American Psychological Association. (n.d.-c). Plagiarism. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/plagiarism
• American Psychological Association. (n.d.-d). Quotations. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/quotations
• Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., & Magazinov, A. (2021). Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals (arXiv:2107.06751). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751
• Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., & Magazinov, A. (2022). The “Problematic Paper Screener” automatically selects suspect publications for post-publication (re)assessment (arXiv:2210.04895). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.04895
• Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of “AI-giarism”: Investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8087–8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
• Chechitelli, A. (2023, May 23). AI writing detection update from Turnitin’s chief product officer. Turnitin. https://www.turnitin.com/blog/ai-writing-detection-update-from-turnitins-chief-product-officer
• Clausse, A., Badalova, F., Cabanac, G., & Mayr, P. (2025). Unveiling tortured phrases in humanities and social sciences (arXiv:2502.04944). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04944
• Commission on Higher Education. (2026). Policies, standards, and guidelines for the framework on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education (CHED Memorandum Order No. 21, Series of 2026). https://cms-cdn.e.gov.ph/CHED/pdf/2026-CMO-21_Framework-on-AI-in-Higher-Education.pdf
• Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023, February 13). Authorship and AI tools [Position statement]. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools
• Elsevier. (n.d.). Generative AI policies for journals. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals
• Erol, G., Ergen, A., Gülşen Erol, B., Kaya Ergen, Ş., Bora, T. S., Çölgeçen, A. D., Araz, B., Şahin, C., Bostancı, G., Kılıç, İ., Macit, Z. B., Sevgi, U. T., & Güngör, A. (2025). Can we trust academic AI detective? Accuracy and limitations of AI-output detectors. Acta Neurochirurgica, 167(1), Article 214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-025-06622-4
• Harvard College Writing Program. (n.d.). Summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting. Harvard Guide to Using Sources. https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/summarizing-paraphrasing-and-quoting
• Hosseini, M., Gordijn, B., Kaebnick, G. E., & Holmes, K. (2025). Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary. Research Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251345499
• Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing & Pedagogy, 2(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v2i2.177
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2026). Use of AI by authors. In Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/artificial-intelligence/ai-use-by-authors.html
• Jamieson, S. (2015). Is it plagiarism or patchwriting? Toward a nuanced definition. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_68-1
• Jamieson, S., & Howard, R. M. (2013). Sentence-mining: Uncovering the amount of reading and reading comprehension in college writers’ researched writing. In R. McClure & J. P. Purdy (Eds.), The new digital scholar: Exploring and enriching the research and writing practices of NextGen students (pp. 111–133). Information Today.
• Krishna, K., Song, Y., Karpinska, M., Wieting, J., & Iyyer, M. (2023). Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
• Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4(7), Article 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
• McAdoo, T., Denneny, S., & Lee, C. (2025, September 9). Citing generative AI in APA Style: Part 1—Reference formats. APA Style Blog. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references
• Modern Language Association. (n.d.). How do I cite generative AI in MLA style? (Updated and revised). MLA Style Center. https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai-updated-revised/
• Philippine Information Agency. (2026). CHED sets guidelines for responsible AI use in higher education. https://pia.gov.ph/news/luzon/ncr/ched-sets-guidelines-for-responsible-ai-use-in-higher-education/
• Purdue Writing Lab. (n.d.). Paraphrasing. Purdue OWL. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_research/quoting_paraphrasing_and_summarizing/paraphrasing.html
• SAGE Publications. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence policy. https://www.sagepub.com/journals/publication-ethics-policies/artificial-intelligence-policy
• Springer Nature. (n.d.). AI guidance for researchers, editors and reviewers. https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/ai/ai-guidance-for-researchers-editors-reviewers
• SUNY Potsdam Libraries. (n.d.). Citing AI: Chicago. https://library.potsdam.edu/citing_ai/Chicago
• Taylor & Francis. (n.d.). AI policy. https://taylorandfrancis.com/our-policies/ai-policy/
• University of the Philippines. (2023). UP principles for responsible and trustworthy artificial intelligence. https://up.edu.ph/up-principles-for-responsible-artificial-intelligence/
• University of the Philippines Diliman AI Policy Committee. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence policy guidebook (Version 1.0). University of the Philippines Diliman.
• Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
• Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
• Wiley. (n.d.). AI guidelines. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/publish/book/resources/ai-guidelines/
• Zielinski, C., Winker, M. A., Aggarwal, R., Ferris, L. E., Heinemann, M., Lapeña, J. F., Jr., Pai, S. A., Ing, E., Citrome, L., Alam, M., Voight, M., & Habibzadeh, F. (2023, May 31). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. World Association of Medical Editors. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106